Yesterday a friend Someone was talking about the new book by Desmond Morris . I thought his explanation about using the clothes were valid, the man is not afraid of sex or have it often, his explanation seemed more based on the cultural responses of man in this society, the practical reasons that made something practical clothing that despite the work to build the people continued to use.
After giving my assessment, I was reminded of the period which usually lasts about four days.
And I thought of a woman 150000 years ago walking through the jungle, with menstruation and I realized it was an easy prey for any predator to continue on the trail of blood that would be leaving, that in nature, is a sign of a wounded animal, therefore an easy prey. And I'm sure that any predator would be respected after the woman.
One way to avoid this problem would be to use something like a bikini, maybe with fragrant leaves, to disguise the smell.
And I guess that would be the origin of clothing for women, for men is even more evident, running with his penis bouncing from one leg to another, does not seem very practical.
That's why I think the theory is equivocada.Pero Morris also talks of the buttocks, his explanation did not welcome me, I did not clear.
This afternoon I had to exit the subway and started to think about it. So I began to assess all the buttocks that looked.
concludes, after a long period of observation, the buttocks more attractive, are usually round, firm and paraditas.
I remembered that the Bushmen women tend to breastfeed their infants until 3 or 4 years as a contraceptive, as a woman to be pregnant should have a certain amount of body fat.
course that does not serve in our society, due to the amount of carbohydrates we eat and the rest of the meal.
Honestly I think they are a byproduct buttocks of upright walking, somewhere must have strong muscles and a pillow to sit, because we can not spend much time standing, sitting and touching the bone is not pleasant .
But that is boring, the better we
But 200,000 years ago that could be taken as an indicator that the woman is of childbearing age, if it is firm but not too old to breed and is healthy and if round means you have enough fat to have children.
I think that is why we make the buttocks as a sexual indicator.
course has no reproductive function, but that would be an indicator sexual, similar to the peacock's tail, which is impractical, but rather goes against the ease with which this bird to flee, and thus makes them more likely to be eaten by someone.
Sexual selection suitable for women that they had these features were favored by more children or couples who were getting stronger, and therefore genes that spread.
Those who had small buttocks were not a favored with the best genes to their sexual partners. And that is why the buttocks of the women are on average larger than that of men as sexual partners to be more healthy and strong these genes are scattered. Even
There are many women with small buttocks, but I think the time to be scattered large buttocks genes was not sufficient and civilization appear all that was ordered coño.Creo pal my hypothesis is more consistent than Desmond Morris.Sin But I will keep watching the buttocks, to have absolute certainty.
evolution, evolution, ecology
